Integration of complex annotations in Bayesian genomic prediction models

Integration of complex annotations in Bayesian genomic prediction models

Multiple, complex, overlapping annotations.... You are wondering how is the best way to use them in your genomic prediction model? The BayesRCO open software is what you need! In the H2020 GENE-SWitCH project, scientists from GABI have developed two new Genomic Evaluation (GE) Bayesian models (BayesRCπ et BayesRC+) to improve assoications between genotypes and quantitative phenotypes while managing complex annotations.

The generalized availability and decreased cost of high-throughput genotyping technologies have accelerated the development of genomic evaluations (GE) for many livestock species. The GE methods share a common objective: to precisly estimate an estimated breeding value from the effects of groupe of SNP (single nucleotide polymorphisms). To do this, Bayesian prediction models were rapidely adopted for their capacity  to simultaneously evaluate in a flexible manner the effects of SNP and also because they can incorporate a priori biological information. In parallel, several international actions are working on characterizing in different species, the functionnal intermediate processes (gene expression, methylation, chromatin accessiblity, ...) in a variety of tissues or developmental stages. The annotations built from these rich functionnal data represent heterogenous and partially overlapping information, that cannot be integrated in the Bayesian models available. 

As part of the H2020 GENE-SWitCH project, scientists from GABI developed two new Bayesian models for Genetic Evaluation (BayesRCπ and BayesRC+) to improve associations between genotypes and quantitative phenotypes while managing complex annotations. These models, published in the Journal BMC Bioinformatics and available in the open software and open BayesRCO (BayesRC for Overlapping annotations; https://github.com/fmollandin/BayesRCO), are based on two hypotheses of different overlapping biological information (incertitude vs increased confidence). The models presented have revealed to be promising for their predictive performance and interpretability on simulated and real data in pigs.
Contact :

  • Dr. Andrea Rau (andrea.rau@inrae.fr) or Dr. Pascal Croiseau (pascal.croiseau@inrae.fr)

See also

Reference

Andrea Rau, Regina Manansala, Michael J Flister, Hallgeir Rui, Florence Jaffrézic, Denis Laloë, Paul L Auer, Individualized multi-omic pathway deviation scores using multiple factor analysis, Biostatistics, Volume 23, Issue 2, April 2022, Pages 362–379, https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa029 

Modification date : 05 October 2023 | Publication date : 07 October 2022 | Redactor : INRAE IMR GABI A. Rau - Edition P. Huan - Translation W. Brand-Williams